Judaism, Christianity and Islam
[19]
See/compare:
|
|
SET A |
Set B |
|
|
[See Webster's, p.1053 for definition of "set": a number of things of the same kind that belong or are used together (italics added)] |
|||
|
Isaiah, ch.14,‡ 12 (italic added) |
Isaias, ch.14,‡ 12 (italic added) |
||
|
a) Good news bible: "King of Babylonia, bright morning star, you have fallen from heaven!" (p.680) (italics added) b) King James version: "How art thou fallen from heaven, O Lucifer, son of the morning!" (italics added) (p.662, undated publication, Eyre and Spottiswoode, London; p.737, The Gideons International, 1985) c) New world translation: "O How you have fallen from heaven, you shining one,* son of the dawn!" (p.786) (italics added)
|
d) Knox bible: "What, fallen from heaven, thou Lucifer, that once didst herald the dawn?" (p.940) (italics added) e) CTS bible: "How art thou fallen from heaven, O Lucifer, who didst rise in the morning?" (p.940) (italics added) |
||
|
*See: i.ibid., p.1392 for index of "Lucifer": "Lucifer, see SHINING ONE" ii.p.1422, op.cit., for index of "shining one": "Shining One": "Is. 14:12 fallen you Shining one" (see below under iii.) |
|||
NOTES:
i. Terminal titular change from "Isaiah" to "Isaias" and substitution of exclamation point with question mark make d and e a different set from a, b and c.
ii. Index data under "Lucifer" (see under asterisk above) makes "shining one" a synonymous cross-reference of "Lucifer". [See here Webster's, p.18a, Explanatory Notes: "A synonymous cross-reference indicates that a definition at the entry cross-referred to can be substituted as a definition for the entry or the sense or subsense in which the cross-reference appears." (italics added)] (Vide note 18 for etymology of "Lucifer": "light-bearing") (see corpus, p. for Lucifer as light-bearer, originally)
iii. See Webster's, p.137 for etymosial consanguinity of "bright" and "shine": bright: "[ME, fr. OE beorht; akin to OHG beraht bright Skt brajate it shines]"
(italics added on "shines")
* * *
Since etymos of "lucifer" is "morning star", and since etymos of "bright" is "it shines" and also since a and c belong to the same set, "bright morning star" in a is proved standing for "Lucifer". Therefore "king of Babylonia" in a represents "Lucifer".
[cf. Cyril Marystone, op.cit., section II, 'The Names of Satan' p.135:
["Some final remarks on Isaiah 14. The King of Babylon is not King Nebuchadnezzar who destroyed Jerusalem in 586 B.C. ... Who then was THIS king of Babylon?" (italics and emphasis added)
[For source of "King of Babylonia", compare here prefatory matter in Good(sic) News Bible (p.vii): "The basic text for the old testament is the Masoretic Text printed in Biblia Hebraica (3rd edition, 1937), edited by Rudolph Kittel. In some instances the words of the printed consonantal text have been divided differently or have been read with a different set of vowels; at times a variant reading (QERE) in the margin of the Hebrew text has been followed instead of the reading in the text (KETHIV); and in other instances a variant reading supported by one or more Hebrew manuscript has been adopted." (italics added)]
Since J proclaims himself to be "bright morning star", testimony of Isaiah independently proves J to be Lucifer.
(For J proved as THE enemy of human race, see corpus,p. )
War against Hinduism. By Stephen Knapp
Aryan invasion a laughing stock. By David Frawley