Insight Footnote [10]

Read Online

[10]

See/compare:

i. synod of Diamper [A.D. 1599--Ed.] (see glossary for Diamper), session 3, cannon 6: "The synod reveals: ... remaining still inviolate[sic] before, during and after delivery Mary gave birth to the incarnate son[sic] of the true god[sic] born without birth pains or other sorrows and without the placenta ever being formed (see ii. below) and without her being subject to purification and other disorders that do occur in other woman and furthermore, both during and after delivery there was no necessity for assistance of any midwife or for any other assistance, for this reason that at the hour and moment pre-determined by holy trinity[sic] the eternal word[sic] emerging with supreme joy and blissful knowledge of the virgin[sic] Mary proceeded from the holy[sic] uterus without any rupture whatsoever of hymen [cited from Sathyanädam, (ME) Medom 1, 1881, 'Synod of Diamper'--see glossary for Sathyanädam and Medom] (italics added)

[The original in Malayalam:

Jesus=Lucifer=THE Devil:

ii.

a) 'Mendel's Laws Challenged', Science Express (see glossary for Science Express), 2 Aug. 1988, p.II, col.4:

[Dr. Azim Surani of Institute of Animal Physiology (Cambridge, eastern England):] "What we have found is that there is a certain category of genes, perhaps as many as one fifth of the genes that are contributed by the parental genomes, which function differently depending on whether they are inherited from the father or the mother.// One of the most dramatic example of this is that the genes that are inherited from the mother are especially important for the development of the embryo itself. Whereas, genes inherited from the father are important for the development of the placental tissues." (italics added)

b ) LIFE Magazine, 30 April 1965, pp.70,72a, quoted in Did Man Get Here by Evolution or by Creation?, pp.119-20:

Over the course of days, weeks and months, the embryo becomes firmly rooted in the uterine wall, and the trophoblast cells develop INTO the placenta. A dynamic organ, the placenta changes constantly ALONG WITH the embryo’s changing requirements. ... As a substitute lung, the placenta extracts OXYGEN and deposits it in the blood of the embryo. (Italics and emphasis added) [see Webster's, p.1243 for "trophoblast": a layer of ectoderm that forms the outer surface of the blastodermic vesicle of many mammals and functions in the nutrition and implantation of the embryo, & p.357 for "ectoderm": the outermost of the three primary germ layers of an embryo (italics added)]

SINCE J BY DEFINITION [see Webster's, p.295 for "definition": an act of defining specifically: the formal proclamation of a Roman Catholic dogma (italics added)] At i. ABOVE IS DEVOID OF

PLACENTA BY REASON OF FATHERLESS IMPLANTATION, J EMBRYO IN MARY IS PSEUDO EMBRYO [[ibid., p.922 for "pseudo": "[ME, fr. pseudo-] being apparently rather than actually as stated [Illustrative Quotation:] (distinction between true and pseudo humanism--K.F. Reinhardt)" (italics added)]] FROM ii a) & b) ABOVE. RESULTANTLY, HIS BODY EJECTED BY MARY AFTER COMPLETION OF TERM IS PSEUDO BODY.

(See corpus, p. For treatment of:

(I. That embryo as being in reality an egg. But here see/compare:

(i. writing of Luke [see Webster's: p.678 for "Luke": a Gentile physician and companion of the apostle Paul traditionally identified as the author of the third gospel in the New Testament and of the Book of Acts; p.475 for "gentile": of or relating to christians as distinguished from the Jews; & p.12 for "Acts": a book in the New Testament narrating the beginnings of the church (italics added)] on ejection of J egg by Mary: She brought forth a son, her first-born, whom she wrapped in swaddling-clothes, and [whom SHE HAD (see below under Footnote--Ed.)] laid in a manger, because there was no room for them in the inn. (Italics added) (Knox bible), p.55/Luke, chapter 2, ‡ 7) (see addendum below);

(ii. Webster's: p.646 for "lay": "to bring forth AND deposit (AN EGG)"; p.138 for "bring forth": BEAR [(Illustration:) brought forth fruit]: to give birth to: PRODUCE; & p.96 for "bear": to be equipped or furnished with : ... to give birth to: to produce as yield - italics and emphasis added)

SEE CORPUS, p. FOR MORE ON ULTRA REBELLIOUS COMPOSING TECHNIQUE [see Webster's: p.229 for "compose": to form by putting together; & p.488 for "technique": a method of accomplishing a desired aim (italics added)] OF LUKE.

But here see exemplification:

Knox bible, p.54: Mary returned home when she had been with her [Elizabeth] about three months; meanwhile, Elizabeth's time had come for her child bearing and she bore a son (Luke, chapter I, ‡ 56, 57) (italics added) (see below for footnote, ibid.)

Cf: CTS bible, p.75: ‡ 56: And Mary abode with her about three months. ‡ 57: Now Elizabeth's full time of being delivered was come; and she brought forth a son (italics added)

Note omission of ';' and 'meanwhile'. [Here see Webster's, p.1518 for "semicolon":

1. links main clauses not joined by ... 2. links main clauses joined by ... (AND) 3. links clauses ... ; & p.706 for "meanwhile": during the intervening time (italics added)]

[ Footnote:

[Knox bible, p.54: It is not certain whether the blessed virgin(sic) returned home before or after her cousin's delivery, since, by Greek usage, THE VERBS IN VERSE 57 MIGHT HAVE A PLU-PERFECT SENSE, "she had brought forth a son", [see corpus, p. For why Luke conceals Mary witnessing ejection of J Lucifer's navel-ous prototype (see Webster's, p.920 for "prototype": an individual that exhibits the essential features of a latter type - italics added) "John"]]

* * * *

(II.[ ... for treatment of] anatomy of resultant body

(& III. further consequential nature of his "suffering") [see corpus, p. for John and Isaac being respectively corporeal prototype and extra-corporeal archetype (see Webster's, p.58 for "archetype": "the original pattern or model of which all things of the same type are representations or copies: IDEA: an inherited idea or mode of thought in the psychology of C.G. Jung that is derived from the experience of the race and is present in the unconscious of the individual" - italics and emphasis added) of J Lucifer]

A d d e n d u m

Knox bible: Luke, chapter 2, ‡ 1,2: It happened that a decree went out at this time from the emperor Augustus, enjoining that the whole world should be registered; this register was the first one made during the time when Cyrenius was the governor of Syria.

[[See here:

[i. ibid., footnote: there is here an ambiguity in the Greek, and some have thought the sense to be, "this was the register which was made before Cyrenius was governor of Syria";

[ii. Swami Abhedänanda:

a) The popular belief is that christ(sic) was born ... in the reign of king Herod (see here Webster's, p.1380 for "Herod": 73?-4 B.C. - italics added), when Cyrenius was governor of Syria and when (according to Luke) Ceasar Augustus decreed the taxation of the whole world, but history tells us differently. History says that Cyrenius was not appointed to this until long after the death of Herod, during whose reign (according to Matthew) Jesus was born. And, again, the taxing mentioned in Luke didn't take place until 10 years after the time mentioned and therefore Eusebius places the date of the birth of Jesus in 10 A.D., ten years after the time accepted by ordinary people (italics added) (Complete Works, Vol. V, pp.131-32)

b) Renan says the census effected by Quirinius to which legend attributes the journey from Bethlehem is at least 10 years later than the year in which according to Luke and Matthew Jesus was born. Whether christ was born under the reign of Herod is a great question. According to Josephus, the census of Quirinius didn't take place until after the deposition of Archalaus, i.e., ten years after the death of Herod. Renan says that proves that the journey to Bethlehem is not historical. (op.cit., Vol. VIII, p.29);

[iii. Webster's, p.1383 for "Jesus": "4-8? B.C.-A.D.? 29 ... the source of the christian religion and saviour in the christian faith" (italics added);

[iv. George Augustine T.A., op.cit., pp.30-32:

The account of the birth of Jesus is given only by Luke. A reader at the present time would still find no abnormality from a casual reading of the account except the fact that the birth took place in a manger. Ultimately, however, he will find that the manger is the sole true indicative--therefore a true symbol--of the real nature of the birth. The ambiguity is actually imposed on the reader by a composing technique devised by the author. Being a physician, Luke was aware if the freak delivery by Mary.

The circumstances that caused Mary to seek a manger are set forth in some detail. They sound so natural that need of a manger is not easily capable of derogation. Even though, at first sight, the passage narrating the birth circumstances does not positively indicate any abnormal feature, it does not contradict the doctrine of the synod of Diamper either (see above at i.--Ed.). But it does contradict the conventional birth theory of Jesus at two points. Both figure in the same sentence.

Luke I, 57 describing the birth of John, Jesus' prototype, is analogous to II,7 which narrates Jesus' birth. The sentence begins in the past tense and ends in the past perfect. Thus the chronologically later episode of Mary's departure is placed in the first clause and the earlier episode of John's birth in the final clause. Knox removes the ambiguity in the footnote. But we find he has not done so in the analogous subsequent account of Jesus' birth.

When we examine the birth account of Jesus in its aspect of analogy with the birth account of John and proceed to apply the plu-perfect tense to the verb 'laid' as Knox has done in the prior account for a valid linguistic reason, we get a similar sentence in which the initial incident is mentioned in the last clause. The fact then emerges of Jesus having been hatched in a manger, removing the ambiguity.

The second premise (in Luke II,7) consists of the reason why Mary took to a manger. It is for want of rooms in the inns. That exigency was caused by a census that was then under way. Obviously, everyone had to flock to his original settlement. Actually, however, the census did not take place until 6 A.D. Writing at a later date and under possession by the devil, Luke fabricated the account making use of true history subsequent to the event narrated that would make the birth of Jesus in a manger plausible.

Historians point out that there is no evidence of such a census held in Judea at the time mentioned. Cyrenius only became governor of Syria after the death of Herod. So, the last clause of the birth sentence not being factually true, the manger was sought by Mary as it was suitable place for such a kind of delivery.

Mary had already witnessed the carrying and ejection of a demon child while staying for three months with her cousin and prototype Elizabeth. Luke was deliberately concealing the facts he well knew, but could hardly narrate without leaving a clue. The Jesus embryo, being bereft of placenta, was LAID by Mary in a manner of a hen laying egg. This is why the Jesus egg had to be hatched in a manger;

[v. synod of Diamper, op.cit., canon 14: Having most clearly witnessed and perceived that Syriac books filled with fell[sic] doctrines and calumnies and wrongful teachings of the fallen[sic] Nestorians and other devilish[sic] creeds have spread throughout this bishopric [of Angamali--Ed. (see glossary for Angamali)], the synod decrees: No one at all shall keep, read or have read to them the books below expounded. To wit [firstly] the book of the infancy of the saviour otherwise called the history of our lady (see below under Book data--Ed.). As this has many calumnies and numerous fables, the fathers have cursed it. Against what is related by the evangelist Luke that the angel of the lord[sic] pronounced the good[sic] news to the holy virgin[sic] Mary at Nazareth, this book states the same occurred at the temple in Jerusalem, ... that st. Joseph took her to priests to test if she had committed adultery and that she underwent test by water in accordance with precepts of the law, that she delivered herself with pain and sorrow at the time of childbirth, that on account of the extreme pain she had to go to a manger in Bethlehem ... (italics added) (cited from Sathyanädam, op.cit., Idavam 2, 1881)

[The original in Malayälam

B o o k D a t a

I. John Dart, Indian Express, Apr.9, 1978 (by arrangement with Los Angles Times), 'New Theories in Biblical Research': The apocryphal[sic] gospel of Thomas (see under ii. below--Ed.) generally thought to be a rewrite of New Testament gospel sayings dated about AD 140 may instead be one of the earliest gospel written, says a Harvard biblical scholar.// If Hermut Koester of Harvard Divinity School is correct, the gospel of Thomas would provide important new material for discerning the teachings of the historical Jesus.// Koester suggests that many individual sayings of Jesus are more primitive in Thomas than in similar versions in the bible and the text as a whole may have been composed at about the same time as the new testament gospel--the last third of the first century.// ... Koester said in an interview: our picture of the early transmission of Jesus and his sayings will definitely change very radically. ...// Known only by title for centuries, ... the gospel of Thomas was rejected by the emerging christian orthodoxy of the 3rd and 4th centuries. The text does not have a biographical framework nor does it mention Jesus' death or resurrection. ...// The gospel of Thomas has added to evidence that Thomas was probably a brother of Jesus named Judas (not Judas Iscariot, betrayer of Jesus), Koester says. ... (italics added)

II. T. Maurice, The Indian Sceptic Confuted, p.69: The very Gospel of the Infancy was originally known in Asia under the title of the gospel of st. Thomas by which name it is often mentioned ... by the fathers ... (italics added); ibid., p.115: One of the most ancient and celebrated of these efforts of pious fraud[sic] ... was the Evangelium Infantae or gospel of the infancy of our blessed saviour[sic], a production probably of the first ages of christianity (italics added)